|This idiot, Oklahoma State Senator A.J. Griffin, wanted to|
pass a law requiring restaurants and public schools to
post anti-abortion propaganda at their expense.
Despite U.S. Supreme Court rulings, Republican legislatures enacted at least 60 new abortion restriction laws, says the Center for Reproductive Rights.
So far ten of those laws were ruled unconstitional by courts, but the efforts continue.
With Roe Vs. Wade still the law of the land, at least for now, I have to admire the, um, creativity of some lawmakers to restrict abortions. It's getting very, very weird.
In Texas, a proposal has been held up in the courts, at least for now. to require cremation or burial ceremonies for miscarried or aborted fetuses.
Nobody actually wants this law passed except the anti-abortion zealots in the Texas legislature. Even the funeral home and cremation industry, which would stand to gain from this, is icked out by it and is unenthusiastic about the idea.
Of course, some people who have had miscarriages want a cremation or interment, and that's their right.
However, creating this law might actually prevent people who want these ceremonies from actually having them.
Acccording to the Texas Tribune:
"For those in the funeral business, the increased demand for cremations could mean ending their practice of charitably cremating the tissue from a miscarriage for parents who wished to have a funeral.
'What had always been pretty much a charitable process is now going to become costing quite a bit of more,' (Texas Funeral Directors Association spokesma Michael) Land said. It's estimated that 10 to 20 percet of pregnacies end in miscarriage."
In other words, Texas lawmakers are so intent on making abortions so excruciating and difficult for women that they think it's worth it to make tragedies like miscarriages excruciating and difficult for parents, too.
Proves that the pro-life crowd is pro-life only until the baby is born. Then it's time to start making life hard.
It's even worse in Oklahoma. (Isn't that often the case?)
According to the Associated Press:
"Oklahoma plans to force hospitals, nursing homes, restaurants and public schools to post signs inside public restrooms directing pregnant women where to receive services as part of an effort to reduce abortions in the state.
Te State Board of Health will consider regulations for the signs on Tuesday. Businesses and other organizations will have to pay an estimated $2.3 million to put up the signs because the Legislature didn't approve any money for them."
The Tuesday referenced in the AP story was last week. We've since learned the Board of Health has approved this ridiculousness.
They were probably pissed off because on the same day, the Oklahoma Supreme Court blocked a regulation that would have required doctors who had admitting privileges at nearby hospitals.
However, we have learned since that the Oklahoma State Senator who introduced the legislation, A. J. Griffin, has since recinded the idea.
Before she did that, we has the legislature in Oklahoma, making restaurants and such pay for anti-abortion propaganda that they don't want in their businesses.
I don't think this would have passed the First Amendment test - the government telling people and businesses what to say or else - but hey, Constitution Smonstitutiion, if it enables you to pander to your most conservative base, right quote, unquote Oklahoma lawmakers?
It appears Griffin backtracked because of the backlash against the cost imposed on businesses by the bill. She now wants to make the anti-abortion propaganda a social media thing, and she theorized it would have a greater reach that way.
But would you want to read anything Griffin or her minions put out on social media?