|Montana State Rep. David Moore is no fan of |
yoga pants. Apparently they are a menace.
Image from Jezebel.
The world is going to hell in a hand basket, and Montana State Rep. David Moore knows exactly why:
Yoga pants. Especially the ones that are about the same color as human skin. It makes a person look naked or something, Moore said.
According to the Billings Gazette, Moore has introduced the morality saving House Bill 365, which would expand Montana's indecent exposure law to include, as the Gazette put it, "any nipple exposure, including met's and any garment that 'gives the appearance or simulates' a person's buttocks, genitals, pelvic area or female nipple."
That list would include flesh-colored yoga pants, Moore said. Other color yoga pants would have been OK, supposedly, under the proposal, but Moore doesn't like any yoga pants.
"Yoga pants should be illegal in public anyway," Moore said after a hearing on the bill, says the Billings Gazette.
This all got started last August, when there was something called "Bare As You Dare" bicycle event in Missoula. This kind of thing happens in a lot of cities lately where people in a group ride bicycles while naked because it's fun, people want to celebrate and promote acceptance of all kinds of body images, or they're making some sort of statement like "bicycles are good" or "fossil fuels are bad."
I'm not sure how riding a bike naked will reduce our dependence on fossil fuel, but what the hell. Nobody is getting hurt at these events, right
If you ask Moore and another Montana lawmaker named Walt Hill, this kind of naked bike ride is a terrible threat to the Good Citizens of Montana, so any kind of indecent exposure must be stopped.
Officials felt like they had to give a permit for the "Bare As You Dare" event last year because denying it would maybe make the officials run afoul of First Amendment free speech protections.
So, the effort is on to cover up Big Sky country.
"I want Montana to be known as a decent state where people can live within the security of laws and protect their children and associates from degrading and indecent practices," the Billings Gazette quoted Hill as saying.
Yeah, because I surely wouldn't feel secure unless there was a ban on naked bike rides, yoga pants and guys walking around wearing no shirts.
The wrong kind of clothing is apparently dangerous, at least in the eyes of some lawmakers.
However, Moore's efforts are for naught. According to Jezebel and the Associated Press, a Montana legislative committed voted to day to quash the anti-yoga pants bill.
At the peak of the craze of wearing baggy pants that sagged halfway down people's butts, some states and municipalities tried to ban the wearing of them.
Too dangerous? Too, I don't know, hip hoppy?
Way back in the 1930s people tried to ban zoot suits because they, like the baggy pants, represented an urban youth culture, rather weighted toward Hispanics, that the adults didn't like.
I'm still not sure how banning certain types of clothing, instead of banning objectionable behavior is going to fix society's ills.
But I guess fixing society's ills is too tough a task, so banning certain types of clothes seems an easy way out.
Talk about the emperor having no clothes!